|
|
Recent news29.07.2010 |
|
Indicator |
H110, RUR, mln |
H109, RUR, mln |
Change, % |
|
Revenue from core activities |
6,980 .3 |
6,639 .8 |
5 .1% |
|
incl. From telecom services |
6,678 .5 |
6,312 .5 |
5 .8% |
|
Operating expenses |
5,216 .1 |
4,907 .7 |
6 .3% |
|
EBIT П |
1,764 .2 |
1,732 .1 |
1 .9% |
|
Pre-tax profit |
1,565 .2 |
1,370 .7 |
14 .2% |
|
OIBDA[1] |
2,467 .7 |
2,433 .9 |
1 .4% |
|
OIBDA margin[2] |
35 .4% |
36 .7% |
- |
|
EBITDA[3] |
2,601 .1 |
2,324 .5 |
11 .9% |
|
EBITDA margin[4] |
37 .3% |
35 .0% |
- |
|
Net profit |
1,210 .7 |
1,071 .7 |
13 .0% |
|
NP margin |
17 .3% |
16 .1% |
- |
Efficiency indicators
Revenue breakdown for 1H 2010
|
Service |
H1 2010, |
H1 2009, |
Change, % |
|
RUR, mln |
RUR, mln |
||
|
Intrazonal telephony |
1,072.0 |
1,103.9 |
(2.9%) |
|
Local voice |
2,702.9 |
2,558.1 |
5.7% |
|
Mobile and radio, wire broadcasting, radio broadcasting, television |
86.3 |
80.1 |
7.7% |
|
Mobile (cellular) telephony |
105.6 |
131.5 |
(19.7%) |
|
Telegraph, datacom and telematic services |
2,281.0 |
1,936.7 |
17.8% |
|
incl. datacom and ISP (except for interactive television) |
2,052.6 |
1,776.2 |
15.6% |
|
incl. interactive television |
157.1 |
95.5 |
64.5% |
|
Interconnect and traffic transit |
430,7 |
502,2 |
(14,2%) |
|
TOTAL |
6 678,5 |
6,312.5 |
5.8% |
Higher service revenues are attributable to:
ISP and datacom revenue
Strong revenue was derived from a rise in the broadband Internet subscriber base, which increased by 87,812 subscribers compared to the first six months of 2009. The subscriber base stood at 415,281 users as of June 30, 2010. Revenue was also influenced by strong promotion of new maximum limit tariff plans, which, in turn, contributed to a rise in revenue from subscriber fees.
As for the service “Interactive television” the growth in revenue compared to the first half of 2009 amounted to 64.5% or RUR 61.6 mln. This was due to an increase in the subscriber base by 42,531 subscribers (the subscriber base stood at 97,209 subscribers as of June 30, 2010). Revenue was also boosted by the commercial launch of interactive TV at the Magadan and Sakhalin branches in September 2009.
Local voice revenue
A 5.7% increase in local voice revenue was attributable to a tariff hike effective February 2010.
Intrazonal telephony revenue
A 2.9% decrease in revenue or RUR 81.82 mln was attributable to a decline in volumes of intrazonal traffic, which resulted in an 11.8% (RUR 88.2 mln) drop in traffic owing to a 20.1% (RUR 62 mln) contraction in F2F traffic. The decline in traffic volumes was attributable to lower demand for this service resulting from mobile substitution. This decrease was partially offset by a 34% rise (RUR 51.1 mln) in lease of intrazonal telecom lines.
Cellular telephony revenue
Cellular telephony revenue decreased by 19.8% in the first half of 2010 compared with the same period in 2009. The decline was attributable to a decrease equal to 74,528 users in the subscriber base. The subscriber base stood at 74,528 users as of June 30, 2010. This trend was driven by fierce competition from the Big-3 in the Magadan region and the Kamchatka krai.
Revenue from interconnect and traffic transmission
A contraction in revenue from interconnect and traffic transmission in the first six months of 2010 was due to the following factors:
Subscriber base trends and proportions of value-added service revenues in H1 2010
Breakdown on expenses, H1 2010
|
Expense item |
H1 2010 |
H1 2009 |
Change, % |
|
RUR, mln |
RUR, mln |
||
|
Payrolls |
1,642.2 |
1,516.0 |
8.3% |
|
Social insurance contributions |
401.5 |
325.7 |
23.3% |
|
Depreciation of fixed assets |
703.5 |
701.8 |
0.2% |
|
Materials[5] |
548.3 |
480.9 |
14.0% |
|
Interconnect (except Rostelecom) |
809.4 |
821.8 |
(1.5%) |
|
Interconnect (Rostelecom) |
173.0 |
171.9 |
0.6% |
|
Outsourcing[6] |
362.4 |
376.5 |
(3.8%) |
|
Deductions to the universal service fund |
71.7 |
66.5 |
7.8% |
|
Taxes and duties on operating activities |
7.3 |
4.7 |
55.3% |
|
Other[7] |
496.8 |
442.0 |
12.4% |
|
TOTAL |
5,216.1 |
4,907.7 |
6.3% |
Miscellaneous revenues and expenses
A loss was reported in H1 2010 a loss equal to RUR 199.0 mln from other non-operating activities (vs. a loss in H1 2009 equal to RUR 864.4 mln) due to the following factors:
In-house and borrowed capital
Far East Telecom’s net assets increased 6.7% as of June 30, 2010 and stood at RUR 10,602.1 mln June 30, 2010 (vs. RUR 9,932.9 mln as of January 1, 2010).
|
|
as of June 30, 2010 |
as of January 1, 2010 |
Change, % |
|
RUR, mln |
RUR, mln |
||
|
Interest debt[8] |
6,891.8 |
6,820.8 |
(1.0%) |
|
Net debt[9] |
6,773.6 |
6,520.3 |
(3.9%) |
Additional information on the company can be found in the SKRIN comprehensive disclosure system at www.skrin.ru , news agency Interfax at www.interfax.ru , and news agency AKM at www.akm.ru.
[1] OIBDA is calculated as revenue minus expenses before depreciation
[2] OIBDA margin is calculated as OIBDA/revenue
[3] EBITDA is calculated as pre-tax profit plus depreciation plus lease payments on off-balance sheet leasing plus interest payable minus interest receivable
[4] EBITDA margin is calculated as EBITDA/revenue
[5] Including expenses for electricity and heat equal to RUR 212.0 mln (up from RUR 184.8 mln in H1 2009)
[6] Information, advisory, audit, transportation, security services and current repair and maintenance, staff retraining and advertising costs
[7] Lease payments, lease of property, private pension insurance, voluntary medical insurance provided for employees
[8] Interest debt is equal to the sum of long-term liabilities on credits and loans and short-term liabilities
[9] Net debt is calculated as interest debt minus the sum of cash minus the sum of short-term financial investments